Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Mesorat%20hashas for Keritot 33:1

והא דתניא חייב בשגגת שבת וזדון מלאכות (דשבתות כגופין דמיין) דקסבר

; and that which taught that he is liable refers to a case where the letters were written in ignorance of the Sabbath but with knowledge of their prohibition, [the liability arising] in pursuance of the rule that awareness is of no consequence with regard to half-sizes.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., although the intervening week-days effect, in similar circumstances, a division as if the transgressor had learnt in the meantime of his trespass, this instance is different, because awareness with regard to half-sizes is ineffective, i.e., if one becomes conscious of sin in between incomplete forbidden acts such as the writing of one letter on Sabbath, one has not segregated the acts one from the other. Awareness in between different forbidden acts brings about a separation of the acts, because it immediately imposes upon the transgressor a sacrifice, which is to serve the expiation of the known act, and its realm cannot afterwards be extended to include also other sins. This does not apply to incomplete acts which do not involve a sacrifice.');"><sup>1</sup></span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Keritot 33:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.

Full ChapterNext Verse